In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, September 12, 2017

12022 - The discovery of DNA fingerprinting - The Hindu



SEPTEMBER 11, 2017 11:13 IST



On September 10, 1984, Alec Jeffreys, while studying how inherited illnesses pass through families, made an accidental discovery. And that has advanced our understanding of genetics. A.S.Ganesh revisits Jeffreys’ Eureka moment...

Are you aware that DNA, like fingerprints, can be used to uniquely identify individuals? If your answer is no, then it’s worth knowing that this technology was discovered only in 1984. If you answered yes, then it might interest you to find out more about DNA or genetic fingerprinting.

Working in a genetics lab at Leicester University, Alec Jeffreys was studying how inherited illnesses pass through families. As part of this work, Jeffreys had to look for patterns in the repeated DNA segments carried by all humans.

In the summer of 1984, Jeffreys set up an experiment to help his research. As part of this experiment, cells were broken open, their DNA extracted and this DNA was attached to photographic films. Radioactive probes were added to identify the repeated sections of DNA and the entire set-up was placed in a photographic developing tank.

Blessing in disguise
Left over the weekend of September 8-9, 1984, Jeffreys hoped to find something that would be useful for his research on that Monday morning. But instead, his first reaction on September 10 as he removed an X-ray film from the developing tank was that it was a complete mess.

Moments later, Jeffreys had a flash of brilliance. He realised that the results at hand were completely futile with respect to their current research, but he did not fail to recognise their value. The sequence of bars in each film represented different number of DNA repeats among the individuals and animals involved in the experiment.

Jeffreys realised that he was onto something and that the different bar codes, when mapped the other way, could uniquely identify individuals. Like fingerprints, DNA could be used to precisely zero down on individuals, except in the case of identical twins or likewise. Furthermore, it was also evident that half of an individual’s DNA came from their mother, and the other half from their father.

Jeffreys got his staff together and they brainstormed to find potential uses of this serendipitous discovery. By the end of the day, they had a growing list which included establishing biological kinship in paternity cases and aiding detective work to figure out criminals.

Put to use
While the initial years saw a flood of immigration cases settled by determining lineage, it was soon used in forensics as well. With the lab kept extremely busy owing to a deluge of requests from around the world, the technique was commercialised and came into effect in labs everywhere in 1987.

There is a growing concern that this technology intrudes on an individual’s right to privacy like never before, but there are plenty of other positives stemming out of the work as well. Biologists use it to study genetics not only in humans, but also in other species. 

Anthropologists use DNA fingerprinting to study evolution in humans and their current global variation through millions of years. 

A discovery that took Jeffreys just an instant is helping us trace back through our own history.