In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, October 8, 2017

12161 - Simply Put: In China’s bikeshare success, peek into big data potential - Indian Express


Information such as which specific social groups are most likely to go where on their bikes is relevant to some arguments in current Indian privacy debates.

Mobike (silver and orange bikes) and Ofo (yellow bikes) are the two biggest cyclesharing companies in China. (Apurva)

“Data”, Reliance Industries chairman Mukesh Ambani said at a gathering of the biggest names in Indian telecom last week, “is the new oil, which does not need to be imported. We have it in super-abundance”. Data has been at the centre of a landmark Supreme Court judgment — on privacy — and endless debates this month. Arguments on its use and abuse have driven the competing narratives on Aadhaar. The seriousness of the government’s data collection push is being brought home through frequent SMSes from banks and telecom service providers asking for Aadhaar linking of accounts and phone numbers.

While India debates privacy and the use of data, China, a comparable country on several counts, has moved to embrace — and regulate — it. The Chinese government has been looking to big data for solutions in areas ranging from policing to education and urban planning to traffic management; the optimal use of big data, it believes, can help foster higher economic growth.

According to the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the full potential of big data remains unrealised due to “low-level sharing of resources”. The Ministry is, therefore, working on establishing industry standards and specifications, and will speed up the creation of a Chinese standard system. The aim, according to state-owned news agency Xinhua, is to more than “triple the scale of (China’s) big data industry by 2020 to foster new economic drivers”.
But big data is already at work in China.
Take, for example, the billion-dollar cyclesharing phenomenon that has taken the country by storm. Since the end of 2015, cyclesharing has grown exponentially, and recent data suggest China hosts 70 cyclesharing brands that include more than 16 million cycles and over 130 million users.
The Chinese model of cyclesharing differs from those across the world in that it requires no docking bays. In Beijing, starting a ride is as simple as finding a cycle parked anywhere, unlocking it using a smartphone QR code, and pedalling away. Rides start from as little as RMB 1 (about Rs 10) per hour, and rides from some brands are free over weekends. Delhi’s cyclesharing model, by contrast, requires users to start and end rides only at cycle docks across the city.
Among the largest share-cycle service providers is Mobike, an over $ 1 billion startup that is backed by the Chinese tech giant Tencent, which runs the country’s popular messenger app WeChat, and Foxconn, which manufactures devices for Apple. Mobike has released a white paper on its service, and the impact on traffic and urban transport — the “first comprehensive nationwide study on bikesharing in China”, developed with support from the China New Urbanisation Research Institute, established by the powerful National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) and Tsinghua University, and published in association with the Beijing Tsinghua Tong Heng Planning and Design Institute.
“Through quantitative and qualitative analysis of Mobike’s vast trove of travel data, as well as the results of a survey of 100,000 people across 36 cities in China, this report analyses how bikesharing is changing our cities. (It) examines bikesharing’s influence on the urban environment and on improving standards of living, and its role in curbing pollution and saving energy,” the white paper says.

The data in the white paper provide remarkable details of the living and commuting habits of the Chinese — which includes, among other things, information on which specific social groups are the most likely to go where on their shared bikes. A few key findings:
1. More than 70% users are aged between 20 and 40 years
2. One out of three users cycles for leisure and exercise
3. Users under 30 years most frequently use cycles to reach their workplaces and schools
4. Users in their 60s and 70s ride most often to restaurants and shops
5. Approximately one in five users uses cycles to complete subway and bus connections
6. Males take more trips than females
7. Male college students are more active on weekends
8. Female college students cycle the slowest
9. Male retirees ride the longest distances and cycle the fastest
10. Men under 32 are the largest user demographic
11. Female homemakers are the smallest user demographic
12. Female professionals take more trips on working days
13. Young working women travel the shortest distances
14. Before the sharing service, only 5.5% of the city used cycles. That number has now more than doubled to 11.6%
15. While share-cycles stood at 6.8%, owned cycles dropped to 4.8%
16. Users reported a 53% decline in autorickshaw trips
17. On average, 81% of trips start around a bus station; in Shanghai, that number is 90%
18. In Beijing, 44% of trips start near a subway station; in Shanghai it is 51%
19. In Beijing, for trips shorter than 5 km, 92.9% of trips are quicker by shared bike with public transport; for trips longer than 5 km, 23.7% of trips are faster by shared bike with public transport.
The white paper also shows that air pollution has no impact on rider activity. The average number of share-cycle trips remained the same even when Air Quality Index (AQI) parameters were low. On Mobike alone, users have travelled 2.5 billion km so far, which, according to the company, translated into saving 460 million litres of petroleum and 29 million tonnes of oil.
Apurva is currently on a media fellowship programme in China under the China Public Diplomacy Association
For all the latest Explained News, download Indian Express App