In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, November 12, 2017

12361 - Aadhaar card: From boon to bane - Merinews


Aadhaar was touted as a weapon against corruption when the idea was first mooted. It was intended to plug leaks in the system thereby ensuring that benefits went directly to the beneficiaries.

But today, it has transmogrified into an instrument of oppression unleashed against all Indian citizens irrespective of whether they are corrupt or not. The incessant and insidious demand to link Aadhaar cards with PAN cards, bank accounts, mobile numbers and now even insurance policies threatens our right to privacy and seems designed to allow government control over all aspects of our lives. This is a very dangerous development with far-reaching repercussions that most Indians as yet seem to be unaware of.

In Focus

Every day people are being harangued by messages to link their Aadhaar cards with their mobile numbers and bank accounts. The tone of these messages is threatening and one can imagine the tension many people, especially senior citizens, are being put to, despite the fact that they have done nothing wrong. It should have been sufficient to link Aadhaar cards with PAN cards if the idea was to check corruption. But demands to link them with bank accounts and mobile numbers are unreasonable and makes one suspect the government's motives. Why should all Indians be treated as if they are hoarders of black money and terrorists? Such measures seem typical of totalitarian governments which seek to have their people under their thumb.

In this digital age, data is power and Aadhaar is nothing but centrally controlled data mining. Aadhaar gives the government unilateral access to our data. Needless to say this gives it great power over us, power which can be misused if we fall foul of it at any time. Is it desirable to surrender so much power to the government? Simply put, Aadhaar is like a genie which has been released from its bottle. There is no saying what havoc it's capable of unleashing.

Just like demonetisation and GST went haywire causing untold suffering to ordinary and non-corrupt Indians, who lost their savings (and some their lives as well), Aadhar too seems to have overreached its purported objectives. The first two initiatives seem to have failed ? all the black money has returned to banks and terrorism is still unabated. These after all were the main objectives of demonetisation.

The cashless narrative came only later when the government realised that the operation had failed. As for GST, everyone now agrees that there is nothing 'good' or 'simple' about it. A flat 10 per cent tax with perhaps some exemptions for certain categories and a simplified process would have ensured better tax compliance. Worse, both measures have crushed the entrepreneurial spirit of the nation. It rang the death knell for many small and medium businesses which provided a decent livelihood for many Indians who could not find jobs. This is a terrible tragedy.

The latest demand to link all insurance policies with Aadhaar is outrageous. It seems like a ploy to deny or delay giving people their insurance payouts. Or maybe it's just another attempt to browbeat the public. In everything it does, the government seems to favour only the interests of big companies and corporations, and not those of the ordinary citizen. One thing is very clear ? the Central government does not trust the citizens of India. In its eyes we are all corrupt and dishonest. The question is ? how can we trust someone who does not trust us? Should we continue to sign away all rights to our identity, privacy and whatever else makes us unique to an entity that can take them away from us in one second?

Editorial NOTE: This article is categorized under Opinion Section. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of merinews.com. In case you have a opposing view, please click here to share the same in the comments section.