In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, February 15, 2018

12795 - Aadhaar data breach: Why robust redressal system is needed to solve grievances with UIDAI - Money Control

Feb 13, 2018 04:20 PM IST | Source: Moneycontrol.com
Since a large quantum of data, including biometric data of individuals is stored with Central Identities Data Repository, the possibility of data theft is palpable with Aadhaar.
Moneycontrol News



By Supratim Chakraborty & Sneh Lata

The public consultation meetings on the white paper, framed by the committee of experts headed by Justice BN Srikrishna, in relation to data protection framework for India has been an eye opener in many respect.

The consultation sessions held in cities like New Delhi, Hyderabad and Bangalore have often meandered towards venting of grievances against Aadhaar by the public.

So much so, that the committee members had to intervene at times to clarify that the consultation meet was not to discuss the Aadhaar related issues but was for a larger goal of determining the data protection framework for India.

It became apparent from these sessions that amidst the controversies and questions surrounding data privacy and protection, Aadhaar has taken the centre stage today.
Whilst the hearing on the need and validity of Aadhaar in India has resumed in the Hon’ble Supreme Court, it is important to discuss some of the critical issues of Aadhaar and its implementation in India.

Taking a cue from some of the rather emotional discussions at the white paper consultation meets, one can state with conviction that there are several gaps in the implementation of the Aadhaar scheme.

These issues are certainly acting as roadblocks for the Government’s ambitious project to take a quantum leap and have a uniform digital identity proof in India.

Critical Hurdles for Aadhaar
One important roadblock in relation to Aadhaar is the lack of clear understanding about the various facets and legal framework associated with Aadhaar.

It is being observed that subsidies, benefits and services are being refused on the ground that individuals do not possess a valid Aadhaar.

The aggrieved individuals are often left with no recourse as there is a lack of understanding and clarity amongst the general public as well as the officials entrusted with the implementation of Aadhaar.

People are unaware that authentication of an individual by the Aadhaar number is not the only mode of authentication of identity of an individual and that the Aadhaar Act itself contains provision that allows for alternate and viable means of identification.

However, it is also a fact that the government is increasingly implementing measures that would ensure that obtaining of Aadhaar becomes mandatory, in effect.

This aspect has been flagged out in the white paper which states that Aadhaar is being viewed by many as coercive collection of personal data by the State.

It has also been frightfully argued before the Hon’ble Supreme Court recently that Aadhaar has empowered the State with a switch with which it can cause civil death of a person.
Aadhaar implementation has also been facing serious hurdles in relation to data security issues.

One such issue is that no authentication procedure has been provided for verifying the identity of the Aadhaar number provider for checking the bank details associated with a particular Aadhaar number.

Any person who knows an individual’s Aadhaar number can find out the name of the last bank linked to such Aadhaar number.
Since a large quantum of data, including biometric data of individuals is stored with Central Identities Data Repository (CIDR), the possibility of data theft is palpable.

Though it may be argued that the superior encryption used for such data would make it impregnable, however, in light of the rapid strides towards quantum computing, this premise could easily be negated and rendered redundant in future.

Whereas UIDAI is attempting to continuously boost security measures for authentication of individuals under Aadhaar by using technologies such as dummy numbers, facial recognition, etc, it is true that despite such attempts there is a possibility of breach, as counter to such technological security attempts are also continuously evolving. Also, the apprehension is - whether it is too little, too late!

The white paper in this regard points out that despite adequate security safeguards, no database is one hundred percent secure. Such enormous amount of valuable personal data acts as a significant motivation for miscreants to hack and, therefore, this concern has to be given due regard.

A Solution in the Making?
In light of all these, it would be important to set up a robust grievance redressal mechanism that would promptly address the issues.

Currently, as per the Aadhaar Act, the courts are to take cognizance of complaints for breach provisions of the Aadhaar Act, only when Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) files a complaint.

It is the need of the hour to devise a framework that allows hassle-free functioning of Aadhaar whereunder one does not have to rely on the integrity or whims of human functionaries implementing the Aadhaar or on the advancement of technology.

This can be achieved through the new data protection law that is in the offing. If the new law, which is equally applicable to both private parties and the government, provides adequate safeguards to maintain confidentiality of individual’s information, holds wrongdoers strictly accountable and provides for adequate grievance redressal mechanism, then some of the important lacunae highlighted in relation to Aadhaar may stand effectively redressed.

If the larger concern of data protection of individual is adequately addressed, the concerns relating to Aadhaar, being a subset of the larger issue, will automatically stand resolved.

(Authored by Supratim Chakraborty (Associate Partner) and Sneh Lata (Associate) at Khaitan & Co LLP. Views are personal)