In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, May 25, 2018

13589 - “Vodafone Sold My Number To Another Customer Without Informing Me”: Is Vodafone Selling Inactive Numbers? - edtimes

May 22, 2018

A recurring issue that has stormed one of the largest telecom giants in the country has come to notice:

THE ISSUE IS THAT VODAFONE SELLS INACTIVE NUMBERS OF EXISTING CUSTOMERS TO DIFFERENT CUSTOMERS AND SOMETIMES, IT EVEN SELLS THE SAME NUMBER TO 2 DIFFERENT CUSTOMERS REGARDLESS OF THE STATUS OF THE NUMBER’S ACTIVITY.

Well, I’m not sure whether to refer to this as just plain ignorance or a carefully worked up evil plan to disrupt their customers’ privacy and put their data and digital presence in danger.

The fact that Vodafone sells inactive numbers holds 2 major debates:
The first one is the obvious harassment that their customers have to face because of the number being sold to someone else.
Now, here’s the catch: If 2 people are operating the same number and you call your contact with that number, there’s no guarantee which person you’ll end up calling.

Secondly, it has been reported by multiple people on Reddit and other forums such as ConsumerComplaints.in that Vodafone sells inactive numbers without even informing the customer. A user said that he had not been using his Vodafone number that often but the company sold his number to a different customer without even informing him.

Another user was quick to point out about how her number was sold to someone and the customer care executives were extremely rude to her instead of helping her out.

Now comes the bigger picture and a more serious debate at hand: a simple contact number is a fundamental block of your digital presence, as you link it to your WhatsApp account, E-mail and multiple other social media facilities and more importantly, for financial services via banks.

If Vodafone sells inactive numbers to different customers and the messages about your bank transactions, identity details, UPI app details, etc. are forwarded to the person with the same number as yours, there’s a high propensity of misuse of your details.

Secondly, this directly shifts the discussion to a point where your privacy also becomes susceptible to damage and leaves your position vulnerable.

One of my colleagues recently pointed out about how her Vodafone number was sold to some other customer (it was a largely inactive number but it was sold without any warning or ultimatum) and it created a ruckus for her, in terms of managing her social media accounts as a lot of them were linked to her Vodafone number.

She also pointed out that her Aadhaar Card had been linked with her Vodafone number and it has now become extremely problematic for her to shift her contacts, important WhatsApp chats and update her number in her Aadhaar Card due to the telecom provider’s negligence which hasn’t been acknowledged by them.

So, where do we as customers stand now?
Because apparently, even our contact number which we have rightfully purchased isn’t even being given a green light for uninterrupted usage, regardless of the status of its inactivity.
And secondly, what is the ultimate cost of data privacy in today’s age and how is this act of negligence any less in terms of magnitude and damage than the ones in the west such as the Facebook/Cambridge Analytica debacle?

Sure, there exist multiple avenues to change your number entirely, shift your messages to a cloud platform and obtain them later but why do 2 customers need to be put through so much trouble over a simple telecom connection?


For all this and much more: Vodafone, we expect an explanation. Make it a good one.